Am I allergic to condoms?

When my boyfriend and I use condoms I can't stay aroused. Is as if the condom dries me up? are there any sensitive condoms I can use, I don't want to enjoy unprotected sex. When we've had unprotected sex I don't enjoy that problem, what can I do?
Answers:

Can i be pregnant?

talk next to a doctor maybe they can make a contribution u something that would help u and also answer ur put somebody through the mill if ur allergic 2 it if u feel as if u are itchy or sore next it could be ur allergic but i would talk it beside a doctor

Does the withdraw method of contraception really work?

A lot of culture are actually allergic to latex. I do believe that some condoms are made of other materials excluding latex.

How can you tell if your hymen is already broken?

i don't judge you have an allergy to the condom, i know a girl who does own a latex ( condoms) allergy and she will have extreme itching and swelling. nouns like possibly you just necessitate to get a correct lube try some ky liquid it is angelic. see if this helps if it does not check near a dr. to rule out latex allergy

Adult women, do you achieve climax next to penile intercourse?

WITH A GLOVE, IT'S NOT LOVE

CONDOMS AS PROTECTION

Editor of Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Dr. C. Michael Roland of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington D.C., spoke about his research on "intrinsic flaws" in latex rubber condoms and surgical gloves (published in Rubber World, June, 1993).

Roland said that what I am almost to relate is "common fluency among good scientists who enjoy no political agenda."

Electron microscopy reveals the HIV virus to be about O.1 microns contained by size (a micron is a millionth of a metre). It is 60 times smaller than a syphilis bacterium, and 450 times smaller than a single human sperm.

The standard U.S. government escape test (ASTM) will detect dampen leakage through holes lone as small as 10 to 12 microns (most condoms sold in Canada are made within the U.S.A., but I'll mention the Canadian test below). Roland say in worthy tests base on these standards, 33% of all condoms tested allowed HIV-sized particle through, and that "spermicidal agents such as nonoxonol-9 may actually relaxation the passage."

Roland's treatise shows electron microscopy photos of natural latex. You can see the pure holes, or intrinsic flaws. The "inherent defects within natural rubber compass between 5 and 70 microns."

And it's not as if governments don't know. A study by Dr. R.F. Carey of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports that "leaching of HIV-sized particles through latex condoms be detectable for as many as 29 of 89 condoms tested." These be brand new, pre-approved condoms. But Roland
say a closer reading of Carey's data in actual fact yields a 78% HIV-leakage rate, and concludes: "That the CDC would promote condoms base on [this] study...suggests its agenda is concerned with something bar public health and welfare." The federal establishment's standard tests, he add,
"cannot detect flaws even 70 times larger than the AIDS virus." Such tests are "blind to leaching volumes less tha one microliter - all the same this quantity of fluid from an AIDS-infected individual have been found to contain as lots as 100,000 HIV particles."

As one U.S. surgeon memorably put it, "The HIV virus can stir through a condom like a bullet through a tennis web."

It's the same story beside latex gloves. Gloves from four different
manufacturers revealed "pits as considerable as 15 microns wide and 30 microns gaping." More relevant to HIV transmission, "5 micron-wide channel, penetrating the entire concreteness were found contained by all the gloves." He said the presence of such defect in latex "is in good health established."

For Canada, the story is the same. A standard Health and Welfare Canada theory test of condoms manufactured between 1987 and 1990, based on stringent test of pressure, leakage, and volume (as contained by the U.S., there is no stab to examine micron-level leakage), reported that an astonishing 40% of the
condoms tested failed at lowest one of the tests. Tests within 1991 showed an "improved" 28% rate.

_________

The few statistics illustrating the effect of condoms use on HIV nouns in homosexual act do not give clear cut results.
R.Detels (1989)lxxxix observed a 2.9% drop contained by seroconversion when condoms were used surrounded by homosexual intercourse, in a cohort of 2915 active homosexuals initally HIV sero-negative.

But, in that statistic, the number of partner for each branch of the cohort was almost as exalted a factor as the use or not of a condom.

L.Levin et al. (1995)xc found that most (71%) of the 140 active-duty young men next to documented sero-conversion who were identified surrounded by various US army installations did use a condom during their homosexual or heterosexual relations.

Results seem to indicate a paradoxal increased risk of seroconversion proportional to condom use in this series.

CONDOMS AND CANCER

May 29, 2004

Potent Carcinogen found in Most Condoms

Recent study have discovered the presence of a very potent carcinogen in most condoms. Small amounts of this chemical are released whenever condoms are used.

Nobody know whether this is serious yet however it is not feasible to be healthy to expose the reproductive organs to cancer-causing substances on a regular principle.

This is a potentially serious issue for much of the world's population that cannot afford or access other forms of birth control. I hope further studies will follow on this soon. Could this be related to the rise in cancer surrounded by women, and men as well?
May 29, 2004 within Medicine | Permalink

http://novaspivack.typepad.com/nova_spiv...

------------

Anal cancer is at least 20 times more adjectives in homosexual men than within heterosexual men.

"Is Screening for Anal Cancer Warranted in Homosexual Men?"
Sexual Health (09.04) Vol. 1; No. 3: P. 137-140::Jonathan StC. Anderson; Claire Vajdic; Andrew E. Grulich

----------

Condom Talc danger is markedly serious

ALL CONDOMS ARE COATED WITH TALC TO PREVENT THEM STICKING TOGETHER

Talc

Talc is a very fine substance, so fine it can be used as a "dry" lubricant.

Talc is a chemical similar to asbestos, a specified cancer causing substance. Talc is found contained by many "infant and body" powders, feminine powders and many cosmetics. It's alsp used as a lubricant on condoms! While it make your skin "feel" slippery smooth, talc does so much more.

How does talc keep babies and your private parts so "fresh"? Presumably by clogging the pores that cloak those necessary fluids. Also, those fine little particle manage to gain into the system. And being similar to asbestos is not comforting, especially when used on babies and genital areas.

Talc's injurious effect on human tissues has be known for fairly some time. Long ago, its dry lubricating properties were used as a glove-donning powder (easy to slide on) for surgical gloves. As impulsive as the 1930's, talc was coupled to post-operative granulomatous peritonitis and fibrous adhesions.
-from Candace Sue Kasper, MD and Dr. P. J. Chandler

Talc...(on condoms)...may result contained by fallopian tube fibrosis with resultant infertility. Question raise by Doctors Kasper and Chandler in Journal of the American Medical Association. (JAMA) 3/15/95
-from Nutrition Health Review, Summer 1995 n73p8(1)

"A possible tie between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, long suspected because of talc's chemical similarity to asbestos, be strongly supported last week when a study found a better risk of the cancer among women who used feminine deodorant sprays. The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, found that women who used talcum powder in the genital area have an increased ovarian cancer risk of 60% and women who used feminine deodorant sprays had a 90% increased risk." In 1994, the FDA conducted a medical workshop on the issue and did not find enough of a apathetic link to claim even a consumer warning.
-from The University of California, Berkeley Wellness Letter, April 1993 v9n7p1(2)

_____________

LATEX DEATHS

THE FDA SAYS ONLY 1% OF LATEX DEATHS ARE REPORTED

Delayed contact dermatitis from chemicals within rubber has be recognized since the 1930s.4 But except for undercooked early reports, clinicians did not appreciate systemic allergic reaction to latex proteins until 1979, when case reports begin to appear in Europe. 5

Latex allergy erupted contained by the United States shortly after the Centers for Disease Control introduced universal precautions within 1987. By late 1992, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received 1133 reports of serious allergic reaction and anaphylaxis occurring to patients and health guardianship staff associated with 30 classes of latex medical devices. There be 15 patient death associated with latex barium enema catheters.5,6

The FDA estimated that the reports represented individual 1% of actual occurrences.6

_________

Recent reports surrounded by the literature indicate that from about 1 percent to 6 percent of the nonspecific population and about 8 percent to 12 percent of regularly exposed form care workers are sensitized to latex.

An estimated 17 million Americans are in a minute sensitive to latex ( up from not one recorded satchel twenty years ago).

_________

CONDOMS HAVE ALSO BEEN LINKED TO BIRTH DEFECTS, INFIRTILITY (in men), PREECLAMPSIA, AND A HOST OF OTHER SERIOUS CONDITIONS.