Is birth control pills a flawless form of birth control or is the shot better?
Answers: In my opinion, neither are a greatly good notion.
A period tell you about your gynaecological form, and synthetic hormones mask the true symptom picture of the length you are getting. Let me explain - if you get a interval that is four days long and completely trouble free, consequently that tells you that your gynaecological form is good, and it is THE ONLY WAY to be sure you are contained by good robustness.
If you take synthetic hormones, it give you a false picture of your health and you are unqualified to monitor your gynaecological health. For example, I have a patient who be put on the contraceptive pill at age 15 for dysmenorrhoea (painful menstruation) - the disease just progressed and at age 25 she have serious pelvic problems and had also developed migrains.
A block form of contraception is far preferable and just as forceful (about 97 percent)
The shot (Depo-Provera) is not for long term use. conceivably you could consider the Implanon, which is implanted into your arm. Depo-Provera is not good for bone-density, and the pills...powerfully, sometimes you may forget to take it. Look into Mirena or Implanon. When you give somebody a lift the depo shot, you dont get your interval, which can cause greatly of problems. For example, when I took it, I used to get extream stomach-ache in my lower stomach. Another piece is you will gain a lot of counterweight, pretty much instantly. I recommend Yaz.. (the pill). It is wonderful, I have not have any side effects what so ever, and it calms the pms down big time. Good Luck.
Don't gain the shot, not for long or short term use. The side affects and vigour risks that a majority of women get while on it are NOT worth the risk.
Depo is as impressive as the pill. 99%.