Is it true that the hormones in birth control pills/etc. are bad for you?

I be reading an article on birth control and it was conversation about how extra hormones may head to cervical cancer, etc. This makes me worried and I am totally against using hormones in the first place... it talk about an alternative solution...approaching a rubber diaphragm... since they are 94% "protective" and women have be using them for years before they debarred them sometime in the precipitate 1900's.

Plus, with adjectives the bad side effects that sticky label along with birth control pills, why embezzle them in the first place if raw birth controls are way safer for you?
Answers:

What is a vagina?

Personally I'd similar to not to be on birth control, but have insanely fruitless periods and nought else will control them. And if it's a choice between agony for a week once a month or a slight increase in my chance of undisputed cancers I'll jump for the hormones every time. Of course, it decreases your likelihood of certain cancer too, so kinda a catch 22 near.

You should look into something like a copper coil, impressive birth control, no hormones.

Vaginal discharge?

I believe it depends on the strength and what birth controll pill the dr. puts you on. Not sure just a thought.

How much should a 19 year ripened girl should weigh?

i dont know how it true it is, but i can believe that is really true because it is not a natural entity for the body to ingest and deal beside so i can go near that

Is this normal?

They're with the sole purpose bad for you if you already hold medical conditions or history that would be exacerbated by the pill (ex: heart conditions and smoke if you're over 35). There is no evidence the pill causes cervical cancer.

Some of us obligation to take them for medical reason;fore our bodies would literally go haywire in need them. The minimal and temporary side effects (which are around the first six months to year you steal them, then run away) are no match for adjectives of the benefits of them.

I don't know what you mean by inbred birth controls, but if you mean the renunciation method, that has a soaring failure rate and does not work. It shouldn't even be call "birth control" because there is NO control.

The pill is undisruptive for some of us. If it's not safe for correct women with medical conditions, they can use condoms or draw from sterilized.

What is this mark on my breast?

All women enjoy a small risk of getting cervical cancer. If you're on the pill, the risk increases, but it's still a low risk. If you get regular pap smears then it will obtain detected and treated anyway. The risk increases you smoke and are over 35.
The pill lowers your chance of ovarian cancer though.

As for the entity about "hormones", the track it works is this: it contains a hormone that your body produces naturally when pregnant. This fools the body into thinking that it's already pregnant, and so it stops any further impregnation from adjectives.

You might want to also ask if you think a 94% nouns rate for the diaphram is high plenty, considering that's a 6 % chance that it won't work.