What happens if you don't know you are pregnent and continue to use the birth control pill?

I don't know what happens, but I know the pill isn't 100%, and on the sign for the pills it say DO NOT TAKE IF PREGNENT OR BREAST FEEDING AND DO NOT TAKE IF YOU THINK U R PREGNENT. What happen?
Answers:

Question for older women?

Did some research... Looks similar to they are saying that here is no soild poof that there is any affect on the fetus within early stages. The things beside breast feeding is that it can create the milk to not be as good.

The one entity I seen be that it can affect the genitals of the baby somehow.

A Question for adjectives?

Well best thing to do is reach a deal with your dind out because if you are taking pills I don't come up with you should be pregnant. But it might happen and after the first month you should know. But to know what really canhappen if you do nick them if your pregnant ask a doctor.

My first day of my concluding period be march 16 and it last like 5days so why am i getting it again today on?

All birth control pill are taken after the period starting from day 1 and ends up after 28 days hence you cannot take these pills minus getting periods and hence once you get your periods you are no longer pregnant so the risk you stated cannot come an adjectives the warning on the bottle is lone to remind you not to take the pills if you hold not got your period.

I haven't had my extent this month.I had locked sex last tuesday.What is going on?

the kid near be deformed but not dead!

i enjoy diabetes my toung gets cuts and sours is this run of the mill?

nothing happens, because it is jut hormones, ut you stil shoulnt appropriate it, and go docters or do a try-out to see whats going on.

why do some girls have red hackle?

go buy the book by Suzanne Somers: Ageless: The Naked Truth About Bioidentical Hormones. buy it at the book store, amazon or ebay. it will tell you that women should never bear the pill.
________

Birth Control Pills and Breast Cancer
November 22nd, 2006

As Dorian noted in NewsSquawk a few weeks wager on, a meta-analysis of breast cancer data lately revealed a statistically significant correlation between use of the contraceptive pill prior to full-term pregnancy and premenopausal breast cancer.

I finally got a moment to hop over to Procedings, the chronicle of the Mayo Clinic that reported on the study, and while the article itself is limited to subscribers, the editorial that offer analysis on the findings is open to adjectives.

First off, I be amazed to read that the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization, categorized the contraceptive pill as a carcinogen in 2005. Granted, I’ve be a bit baby enthralled for the last couple of years, but I cannot believe I never read this report anywhere. Did it get any press? If not, why not?

Now for the findings…it appears that women who hold ever used birth control pills have a ”small but statistically significant increased risk of breast cancer”. Furthermore, use of the Pill since having one’s first full-term pregnancy is more strongly associated beside breast cancer than being on the Pill after have delivered a infant. The association is even stronger where these pre-baby Pill users be on birth control pills for four years or more. (The editorial further notes, “A superior risk of breast cancer for OC use before first full-term pregnancy be first described more than 25 years ago by Pike et al…” - again, I’m very surprised that evidence linking the Pill and breast cancer have been uncovered for so long, next to so little press.).

Posted by MommaSteph.
_____________

from Suzanne's book:

Those of us who were on the innovative birth control pills for any length of time were in truth on synthetic hormones- strong synthetic hormones. Any wonder why women of our generation are underneath siege from an epidemic of breast and ovarian cancers? There is a intermingle, and you'll learn more roughly it in this book.

Read on and see if you relate to my scenario: As I said, for twenty-two years, I be on synthetic birth control pills, the original ones that be very strong. I even manipulate my periods next to them, if I didn't want to have a term on a particular weekend. I simply didn't realize what was contained by those birth control pills, nor did I understand the danger of messing with disposition.

I did not realize that having with the sole purpose a two-day bleed meant that I be not ovulating fully. At the time, I thought it was great to enjoy such a light length. I did not realize that the importance of ovulation surrounded by the human female body is to permit the brain know that I was economically, healthy, and reproductive. As far as my brain be concerned, I was not reproductive because I be not fully ovulating. An ovulating woman is a reproductive woman.

To believe that the body is not fully ovulating is a dangerous assumption for the brain to brand name. If the brain perceives us as unable to reproduce, its charge, biologically speaking, is to try to eliminate us to spawn room for the reproductive ones. This is the nature contained by us. This is the template that was programmed surrounded by us from ancient times. Thus, this hormonal imbalance that I unknowingly put myself in be creating a backdrop for cancer. Why? Because we adjectives have cancer surrounded by us, but as long as we are hormonally balanced, the brain perceives us as childlike, strong, and healthy. If we become imbalanced, this signals to the brain that the reproductive system is no longer in working writ, and it is in this scenario that the cancer have a chance to come into individual.

You see, cancer proliferates in an environment of hormonal lack of correspondence. This is why I believe that Western medicine's standard of fastidiousness, well-meaning as it is, is treating us incorrectly. Western medicine is looking at everything except the discernible. Western medicine is trying to poison the cancer out of us, further wreaking havoc beside our hormonal systems.

Then, to prevent recurrence, we are given hormone ablation drugs such as tamoxifen or Femara, which interfere next to the body's ability to read the hormones surrounded by some parts of the body. Plus, for many women these drugs create horrible side effects. To me, it doesn't make sense to embezzle any drug that prevents new hormones from individual made in our bodies or to kill in cold blood off any of the little bit of hormones we might own left. Why have Western medicine be trying to outthink nature? We are given lie hormones that don't replicate exactly what our bodies make essentially, and doctors are expecting them to work in the same course or better. It hasn't worked. Look around. Are the women you know doing well from midlife on? Most everyone have complaints, from mild to severe. No wonder women are in such bad shape.

Once you get the importance of your brain perceiving the body as reproductive--our "brain template"--it will be easier for you to gross decisions for yourself. We assume that the professionals who are taking exactness of us know what they are doing. But they can't know what they haven't been qualified, and unless you find yourself a doctor such as the ones.

Why is it my dr won't remove my ovaries without a medical motivation, but they will perform abortions?

My aunt have the similar case,she used to grasp periods after 4-5 months ,she get preganant and didnot realise it,she was still taking birth control pills.after 4 months she know she was pregnant and finally she get an abnormal child.

Girl Problem(s), inevitability help I should read aloud!?!?

there is a small chance it can mischief your baby but it is impressively unlikely my ma took the pill till she was six months pregnant cos she didnt no she be pregnant but the baby is fine