Would you return with the Gaurdasil shot...?
would you get it knowing that near may be risks along with it? Apparently in the ingredients it has a carcinogen, roach hired gun, and aluminum... and some other scary ingredients. And it hasn't been tested for long term side effects...
I get my first shot... I am going back to the doctors in about a month to seize my 2nd shot, I am just curious as to what others would do in a situation where the shot is available for $1.00. Would you receive it or no?
Answers:
My 11 year old daughter have completed her series of 3 injections. She did not have any side affects and after seeing me going through surgery for something this shot could prevent, we are both darned glad she got it. I would have remunerated full price for the shots if our insurance didn't fully cover it. So, i you are getting it for a dollar, kudos to you!
No.
It hasn't be proven safe after long-term use. It's too new.
It's also not what was promised (a cure for HPV) as mentioned within Newsweek magazine back in 2002. For that reason and others (too out-of-date, already infected), I couldn't get it even if I wanted to. It would be a waste of time and money for me.
If they found something that be a REAL CURE for HPV, yes I would get it. But Gardasil is not it. Source(s): You can't downthumb my personal experience with HPV.
You've heard wrong about the ingredients. While it won't completely prevent adjectives forms of cervical cancer, it does help prevent the most common ones. I recommend completing the series.
I've gotten all three of them already. I haven't died yet, and I think it's a polite idea for all women to get it. I don't devise they would put a vaccine out that had those kinds of ingredients in it, so I'd ask your doctor. They'll know. I significantly doubt there is any of that stuff.
Yes i got mine over 2 years ago you requirement to get it for cervical cancer
What you said about the ingredients is adjectives untrue.
I got all 3 last year (state given-all $12) and I hold had no problems at all.
Gardasil is designed to protect you against CERTAIN strains of the HPV virus, which is responsible for genital warts and cervical dysplasia, which can lead to cervical cancer. This sounds ideal, but the shot is with the sole purpose effective IF you are not sexually active and are under 26ish. Now, I individually have a very big issue with the drug. If it works, great. However, it lacks proper trialling. It is a very new drug (pharmaceutically speaking) and no long term effects own been noted. In all my health, sexuality, biology and nursing classes every one of my professors (all of whom are doctors) did NOT agree beside Gardasil. It is being pushed upon us very quickly minus the risks being known or explained. If and WHEN they prove that there are no long occupancy side effects I will support this drug and the hype around it. Here is an exerpt from the Journal of the American Medical Association:
The new vaccine against 4 types of human papillomavirus (HPV), Gardasil, like other immunizations appears to be a cost-effective intervention beside the potential to enhance both adolescent health and the quality of their full-grown lives. However, the messages and the methods by which the vaccine was marketed present important challenge to physician practice and medical professionalism. By making the vaccine's target disease cervical cancer, the sexual transmission of HPV was minimized, the threat of cervical cancer to adolescents was maximize, and the subpopulations most at risk practically ignored. The vaccine manufacturer also provided educational grant to professional medical associations (PMAs) concerned with adolescent and women's health and oncology. The funding impelled many PMAs to create educational programs and product-specific speakers' bureaus to promote vaccine use. However, much of the material did not address the full complexity of the issues surrounding the vaccine and did not provide perched recommendations on risks and benefits. As important and appropriate as it is for PMAs to advocate for inoculation as a public good, their recommendations must be consistent with appropriate and cost-effective use.
I love the concept of this, and I really hope it works, but I do not believe it should be put into our institution systems and made mandatory until further testing is done.
As for your ingredients, they ARE safe. No mercury, no thiomersal, no household cleaners or other things you find in cigarettes. Source(s): Alcamo's Fundamentals of Micorbiology
JAMA
Canadian Fundamentals of Nursing (Potter & Perry)
Physical Examination & Health Assessment (Jarvis)
A committed belief in educating women about women's / reproductive / sexual health.
I had all the shots a few years ago. Yes, it's major for all women to get it.
Related Questions: